Which of the following best describes a secondary source?

Study for the Honors Ancient History Exam. Master the material with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each featuring detailed hints and explanations. Prepare effectively for success!

Multiple Choice

Which of the following best describes a secondary source?

Understanding the difference between primary and secondary sources in history is what this question tests. A secondary source is an interpretation, analysis, or synthesis created after the events, using primary sources to explain or evaluate what happened. It’s the historian’s narrative that discusses, compares, and contextualizes original material. Modern histories and scholarly analyses are classic examples of secondary sources because they interpret and explain ancient events rather than presenting the original evidence themselves. In contrast, an ancient inscription, a coin hoard, or a temple inscription are primary sources: they are direct artifacts or records from the past, not the later interpretation of them. So the best choice identifies later analysis, such as modern histories, as the secondary source.

Understanding the difference between primary and secondary sources in history is what this question tests. A secondary source is an interpretation, analysis, or synthesis created after the events, using primary sources to explain or evaluate what happened. It’s the historian’s narrative that discusses, compares, and contextualizes original material.

Modern histories and scholarly analyses are classic examples of secondary sources because they interpret and explain ancient events rather than presenting the original evidence themselves. In contrast, an ancient inscription, a coin hoard, or a temple inscription are primary sources: they are direct artifacts or records from the past, not the later interpretation of them.

So the best choice identifies later analysis, such as modern histories, as the secondary source.

More practice questions